The country’s largest utilities may choose to shutter their fossil fuel plants rather than take advantage of the generous tax credits the Biden administration is offering for installing carbon capture.

POLITICO’s E&E News contacted the 10 companies that control the largest coal and natural gas fleets in the U.S. — and found that only one has active plans to adopt technology to snare their greenhouse gas pollution. Despite substantial federal subsidies and a proposed EPA mandate to cut power plants’ emissions, utilities are simply unenticed, write Carlos Anchondo, Jason Plautz and Zach Bright.

Even in Wyoming, where a 2020 law requires utilities to trap and store carbon rather than close coal plants, a major state power provider announced this spring it would retire plants instead of retrofitting them.

While shutting down more fossil fuel plants could help achieve the emissions cuts needed to avert the worst of climate change, some analysts worry that too many closures could destabilize the grid.

A lack of appetite for carbon capture among utilities could also help conservatives persuade courts to strike down EPA’s proposed pollution standards as too onerous. West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey (R) has pledged to challenge the rule in court.

So what gives?

Utilities’ job is to keep the lights on and rates low. New technology means new risks, and utilities don’t like that, said Emily Sanford Fisher of the Edison Electric Institute, which represents U.S. investor-owned electric utility companies.

“This is an industry that is not generally incentivized to work with emerging technologies,” she told Carlos, Jason and Zach. “Our regulatory structure does not love the risk involved in new technology.”

Another reason is cost. Utilities trying to comply with the EPA’s proposal might find it makes more economic sense to retire their fossil fuel plants or switch to hydrogen-fired gas power, said Metin Celebi, a consultant with the Brattle Group.

And while EPA says carbon capture is an “effective mitigation measure” that power plants can employ readily, utilities are not convinced the technology is ready.

Most carbon capture and storage facilities in the U.S. are linked to ethanol production or natural gas processing. Only one commercial-scale, coal-fired power plant used carbon capture in the U.S., and the project was mothballed in 2020, amid a drop in oil prices and the onset of the pandemic.

The Biden administration remains undeterred. At a recent news conference, EPA Administrator Michael Regan expressed confidence the technology was “within reach.”

“If we’re successful,” he said, “not only can we deploy this technology, we can also export it internationally. We can help places like China and India reduce emissions and come into compliance.”

It’s Tuesday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO’s Power Switch. I’m your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to [email protected]

Today in POLITICO Energy’s podcast: Zach Warmbrodt breaks down what the GOP is trying to achieve by dedicating a month to scrutinizing how corporations integrate climate and social goals into their business plans.

How MTG’s district became Biden’s climate poster child

President Joe Biden and Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene have at least one thing in common: They’re both big fans of a solar factory in Dalton, a sleepy corner of northwest Georgia, writes Robin Bravender.

The area is decidedly not Biden country. Former President Donald Trump won nearly 70 percent of the votes in the area in 2020, the same year the district first sent the flamethrowing Republican Greene to Congress.

So the heart of Greene’s district might seem an odd place for a solar plant that’s become a poster child for the Biden administration’s climate policy agenda.

But that’s the story behind Hanwha Qcells, a South Korea-owned company that built the largest solar panel manufacturing plant in the Western hemisphere in an industrial area south of Dalton’s downtown.

Carbon metric vibes at SCOTUS
Republican-led states are urging the Supreme Court to strike down the Biden administration’s method of justifying costly climate regulations, write Lesley Clark and Niina H. Farah.

Their efforts may fall flat — even before a conservative-dominated Supreme Court — because of a precedent set in June, when the high court ruled that GOP-led states didn’t have the power to sue over an immigration enforcement policy.

Hotter days = air travel delays
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby said air travelers should brace for even more of the delayed and canceled flights that have made flying so miserable recently, all because of climate change, writes Alex Daugherty.

“More heat in the atmosphere, thermodynamics 101 — we’re going to have more thunderstorms,” Kirby said at a POLITICO event on reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration.

The nuclear option
Congress has seen a surge this year of bipartisan nuclear bills that, put together, would produce a mammoth build-out of reactors and fuel supplies over the next decade, writes Nico Portuondo.

But a split Congress and a razor-thin House Republican majority will make it a challenge to sign any legislation into law.

The making of a multibillionaire: How a Houston oilman confounded climate activists and made billions.

The demand side: Unsold electric cars are piling up on dealer lots.

A showcase of some of our best subscriber content.

Europe’s record-shattering heat wave last summer led to the deaths of more than 61,000 people, scientists have concluded. And that’s probably still an underestimation.

The demand for key minerals needed for electric vehicles and clean energy projects has doubled in the past five years, raising concerns about supply shortages.

Western sanctions imposed on Russia haven’t stopped the country’s fossil fuel exports, but they have made those exports a lot less lucrative.

That’s it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.