Former Member, Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife, United States House of Representatives
Member, Committee on the Judiciary
Member, Natural Resources Committee
Member, Select Committee on the Climate Crisis
Vice Chair, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law
Member, Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet
Member, Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship
Chair, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands
— Awards:
Rising Star, 2012-2013, Colorado Super Lawyers
Consumer Protection Award, 2017, international Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation
Distinguished Recent Alumnus Award, Law School, University of Colorado
— Pets (include names):
Reason for Seeking Public Office:
My faith in democracy and the promise of the American Dream have been shaped by my family's journey to this country. As a first-generation American, I have been driven all my life to give back to our community, state and country because each has given my family and me so much. My parents fled a war-torn country in east-Africa over 30 years ago and eventually settled in Highlands Ranch, where my sister and I were raised. As hard-working naturalized citizens, they have never forgotten or taken for granted the freedom and opportunity this country gave them and their children. Their experience motivated me to be an active participant in our democracy at an early age, and to give back through public service. I've been honored to do just that as an attorney, public servant, and elected member of the CU Board of Regents, and it is why I am running for Secretary of State of Colorado.
All Colorado citizens have a stake in the direction of our state and each of our voices is important. As Secretary of State I will work to return integrity, transparency, and accountability to the office. Elections are the foundation of a representative government and are too important to be the victim of partisan games. I will work to ensure that all eligible voters can cast their vote and claim their stake in our state's prosperous future. As a business attorney, I also recognize the importance of having a vibrant and positive climate for businesses, small and large, and I pledge to work to ensure that all who want to create a start-up business in our state can. By streamlining and cutting the red tape, utilizing and implementing cutting edge technological tools, and adopting the best practices of our peers near and far, I know we can make Colorado one of the best states to start and run a business.
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- No
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Unknown Position
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position
Latest Action: House - 06/21/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Tracker:Latest Action: 06/20/2019 On agreeing to the Neguse amendment (A030) Agreed to by voice vote.
Latest Action: 06/20/2019 On agreeing to the Neguse amendment (A029) Agreed to by voice vote.
By Ed Perlmutter and Joe Neguse We're in this together." A phrase we've heard and repeated often since the COVID-19 crisis began. And it is certainly true -- we are in this together, and will get through this as a community, state, and country -- together. Unfortunately, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell does not share our view. According to him, that's not the case when it comes to aid for teachers, law enforcement, firefighters and other public employees supported by state and local governments. Instead, McConnell favors allowing states to declare bankruptcy, even going as far as to say it will "save some cities." Refusing aid to state and local governments means refusing to support many of the frontline workers who are keeping our country running during this public health emergency -- public health workers, EMS workers, corrections officers, sanitation workers, custodians and so many more. These workers -- many of whom are our neighbors, friends and family -- are the real people impacted when we talk about supporting state and local governments. We need to do everything we can to help these workers so they can continue to provide critical services to all of us. That's why Congress must act to provide funding and flexibility for state and local governments to respond to the current COVID-19 crisis and address the revenue shortfalls as a result of this pandemic. This funding isn't a handout; it is about stabilizing city, county and state governments and supporting the millions of families who rely on vital services each and every day. U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Boulder. Andy Colwell, special to The Colorado SunWe are committed to ensuring Congress includes additional relief for state and local governments in the next coronavirus relief package through inclusion of two bills that we've introduced. The Coronavirus Relief for States Act and the Coronavirus Community Relief Act will work hand-in-hand to address both state and local needs and provide necessary funding for our frontline workers. First, the Coronavirus Relief for States Act will provide $500 billion in flexible funding for states to respond to the current crisis, replace lost revenue and support economic recovery. The $500 billion amount matches the request from the National Governors Association and has the support of Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, who has warned of an "unmitigated economic crisis" absent "direct, robust and immediate state and local aid." Second, the Coronavirus Community Relief Act will provide $250 billion in stabilization funds directly to local communities, cities and towns that are facing challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, it removes a previously included population threshold and separates local and state stabilization funds to allow for smoother disbursement and allocation of monies between city, county and state governments. This bill is supported by the National League of Cities and countless rural towns and cities across America. State and local officials are leading the on-the-ground response to this pandemic, making difficult decisions to protect their residents. As we get a handle on the public health aspect of this crisis, we must be prepared to face the economic calamity still ahead of us. This is not a time to turn our backs on our state and local communities, but instead a time to double down and remember we are all in this -- together.
Fri MST
Tue 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM MDT
Sun MDT
279 Garnet St Broomfield 80020