Former Ranking Member, Central Intelligence Agency Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Energy Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Regulatory Reform, Commercial, and Antitrust Law Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Science, Space and Technology Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, United States House of Representatives
Former Ranking Member, Central Intelligence Agency Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Energy Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Regulatory Reform, Commercial, and Antitrust Law Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Science, Space and Technology Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, United States House of Representatives
Member, Committee on Homeland Security
Member, Committee on the Judiciary
Member, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Member, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law
Member, Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet
Member, Subcommittee on Intelligence and Counterterrorism
Chair, Subcommittee on Intelligence Modernization and Readiness (INMAR)
Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Technologies and Advanced Research (STAR)
Ranking Member, Subcommittee on the CIA
— Father's Occupation:
— Mother's Occupation:
July 8, 2019: Eric Swalwell quits 2020 presidential race.
May 13, 2019: Swalwell met with gun violence educator Scott Charles.
May 10, 2019: Swalwell appeared on VICE News Tonight on and announced a town hall in Indiana May 19.
May 10, 2019: Swalwell appeared on Pod Save America, discussing his campaign, work on the House Intelligence Committee, and how he will connect with Trump voters.
May 8, 2019: Swalwell’s campaign staffers also unionized with representation from the Teamsters.
May 6, 2019: Swalwell campaigned in Reno, marking his second visit to Nevada as a presidential candidate.
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- No
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Yes
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Yes
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- No
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- No
Latest Action: House - 06/21/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/20/2019 Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Tracker:By Eric Swalwell The US airstrike that killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad lacked two key elements that any American military strategy must have: the trust of the American people and allies to back us up. This world is full of bad actors, and how we choose to deal with them has far-reaching implications for our immediate national security and our long-term interests. Our adversaries, including Russia, China and North Korea, work against our interests every day, but we don't call in airstrikes against their top leaders or generals. Soleimani was among the worst, but he was not from some stateless terrorist organization -- he was a sovereign nation's senior military leader. This is the first time in recent history the United States has eliminated such a figure. Yet President Donald Trump took this momentous step alone and without any identifiable plan for the ramifications. He did not consult our allies or notify Congress. Had he done so, he would have heard words of caution from prominent officials and allies. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the world can't afford another war in the region, and leaders "must exercise maximum restraint." Federica Mogherini, the European high representative for foreign and security policy, tweeted that Soleimani's killing was "an extremely dangerous escalation." Even our British allies are urging de-escalation. Perhaps most importantly, the President took this grave step without the confidence and faith of the American people, three quarters of whom, according to a poll conducted before the killing of Soleimani, do not want to wage war in Iran, and the majority of whom disapprove of Trump's foreign policy. It is not at all clear that his actions are based on credible intelligence, or even that they were undertaken in the best interests of our national security. We are beset by doubt, and rightfully so. An American president should be knowledgeable, thoughtful and trustworthy enough to discharge his or her duties as commander in chief without immediately being second-guessed. Sadly, that is not how President Trump governs. President Trump's past actions have alienated and angered our allies. And he has forfeited the benefit of the doubt by barraging us with lies on matters involving Russia, by throwing our own intelligence community and public servants under the bus when they contradict him and by ignoring our military experts' advice whenever it fails to fit into his personal political goals. We've seen this particularly in his conduct regarding Ukraine, for which he was impeached. During a House Intelligence Committee hearing in November, Marie Yovanovitch, a longtime public servant and the former US ambassador to Ukraine, testified that "the US is the most powerful country in the history of the world in large part because of our values, and our values have made possible the network of alliances and partnerships that buttresses our own strength." It is a principle that, according to overwhelming evidence, President Trump ignored. He withheld millions of taxpayer dollars from Ukraine, while it was at war with our adversary, to score cheap political points. And when brave public servants came forward to question and expose his criminal and unconstitutional actions, the President unleashed his wrath on them, calling our diplomats and military personnel -- who served courageously across multiple administrations -- traitors. Some have asked why what President Trump did in Ukraine matters; this crisis makes it clear. As Yovanovitch explained in her November testimony, President Trump's rash conduct "undermines the US, exposes our friends, and widens the playing field for autocrats like President Putin. Our leadership depends on the power of our example and the consistency of our purpose. Both have been opened to question." In short, when our values are called into question and our alliances soften, America is weaker. That is where we find ourselves now as President Trump puts us closer to the brink of full-scale war. Where was President Trump when all this occurred? The world saw him hanging out at Mar-a-Lago as it learned of the action he took without consulting Congress, without the support of our allies and with the likelihood of blowback that could affect everyone's security and economy. He behaves now as he always has -- as if he's the CEO of his own little fiefdom, and he need answer to nobody. Protecting American lives is any president's paramount duty, but we must determine whether sound intelligence justified this strike. We must know he is protecting our security and not his own selfish interests. President Trump has refused to acknowledge that the Constitution and the law apply to him; now his hubris tells him he has the power to wage war all by himself. None of this is acceptable. Congress must and will do its constitutional duty by wielding its powers of the purse and of oversight. Given his abysmal track record, we cannot and will not take him at his word. We cannot let him unravel the credibility and trust that this country has spent its entire history earning from its allies and its own people. The world used to know that we cared about our allies, about the rule of law and about democracy. It must know so again; we must not let the President lead us into an unnecessary war on his personal whim.
By Ryan C. Brooks | BuzzFeed News Saul Loeb / AFP / Getty Images California Rep. Eric Swalwell announced at a press conference Monday that he is ending his short-lived bid for president and running for reelection to his House seat, becoming the second Democrat to drop out of the 2020 race, leaving the field at 23 candidates. “After the first Democratic presidential debate, our polling and fundraising numbers weren’t what we had hoped for, and I no longer see a path forward to the nomination. My presidential campaign ends today,” Swalwell said. Swalwell’s announcement comes just three months after he declared he was running during an April appearance on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. “The polls have had their way, so here we are in July,” Swalwell told reporters of his decision to drop out. That decision isn’t exactly a shock. Despite qualifying and participating in the June Democratic debates, Swalwell’s campaign has failed to gain traction in the crowded field of candidates and has dwindled on the lower end of polling. Swalwell’s campaign abruptly canceled a swing through New Hampshire over the long Independence Day weekend. Swalwell is best known for his position on the House Intelligence Committee and the House Judiciary Committee and his work on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Swalwell, 38, was one of the youngest Democrats running for president and spent his time during the June debate telling former vice president Joe Biden that it was time for him to “pass the torch” to a younger generation of Democrats so they could solve issues like gun control, automation, student loan debt, and climate change. The first candidate to drop out of the race was Richard Ojeda, a former West Virginia legislator and congressional candidate who briefly ran a populist campaign for the Democratic nomination after losing his House race. He quit the 2020 primary at the end of January. The remaining candidates are: former vice president Joe Biden; Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Michael Bennet, Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, and Kirsten Gillibrand; Reps. Seth Moulton, Tulsi Gabbard, and Tim Ryan; South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; former Colorado governor John Hickenlooper; Washington Gov. Jay Inslee; Montana Gov. Steve Bullock; former representatives Beto O’Rourke, John Delaney, and Joe Sestak; New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio; entrepreneur Andrew Yang; former Housing secretary Julián Castro; author Marianne Williamson; Miramar Mayor Wayne Messam.
Tue 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM EDT
Thur 4:30 PM – 5:00 PM EDT