Share on WeChat
https://www.powervoter.us:443/art_robinson
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
Quick Facts
Personal Details

Education

  • PhD, Chemistry, University of California at San Diego, 1968
  • BS, Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, 1963

Professional Experience

  • PhD, Chemistry, University of California at San Diego, 1968
  • BS, Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, 1963
  • Writer/President, "Access to Energy" Newsletter, 1994-present
  • President/Research Director, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, 1980-present
  • President/Research Director/Co-Founder, Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine, 1973-1978
  • Research Associate, Stanford University, 1970-1972
  • Assistant Professor, University of California at San Diego, 1968-1972

Political Experience

  • PhD, Chemistry, University of California at San Diego, 1968
  • BS, Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, 1963
  • Writer/President, "Access to Energy" Newsletter, 1994-present
  • President/Research Director, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, 1980-present
  • President/Research Director/Co-Founder, Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine, 1973-1978
  • Research Associate, Stanford University, 1970-1972
  • Assistant Professor, University of California at San Diego, 1968-1972
  • Candidate, Oregon State Senate, District 2, 2020
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, Oregon, District 4, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018

Current Legislative Committees

Member, Committee on Human Services, Mental Health and Recovery

Member, Education Committee

Member, Environment and Energy Committee

Religious, Civic, and other Memberships

  • PhD, Chemistry, University of California at San Diego, 1968
  • BS, Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, 1963
  • Writer/President, "Access to Energy" Newsletter, 1994-present
  • President/Research Director, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, 1980-present
  • President/Research Director/Co-Founder, Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine, 1973-1978
  • Research Associate, Stanford University, 1970-1972
  • Assistant Professor, University of California at San Diego, 1968-1972
  • Candidate, Oregon State Senate, District 2, 2020
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, Oregon, District 4, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018
  • Chair, Oregon Republican Party, 2013-2014
Policy Positions

2019

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No

2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- No

Campaign Finance

Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- No

Energy & Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Unknown Position

Guns

Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No

Health Care

Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Yes

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position

Marijuana

Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position

Oregon Congressional Election 2010 Political Courage Test

Abortion

1. Do you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-life?
- Pro-life

2. Should abortion be legal only within the first trimester of pregnancy?
- No

3. Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
- No

4. Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
- Yes

5. Should federal subsidies be prohibited from being used for abortion procedures?
- Yes

6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Budget, Spending, and Tax

Spending

Indicate what federal funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category- you can use a number more than once.

1. Agriculture
- Eliminate

2. Arts
- Eliminate

3. Defense
- Maintain Status

4. Intelligence operations
- Maintain Status

5. Military hardware
- Maintain Status

6. National missile defense
- Greatly Increase

7. Salary and benefits for active duty personnel
- Slightly Increase

8. Programs to improve troop retention rates
- Maintain Status

9. Research and development of new weapons
- Slightly Increase

Spending

Indicate what federal funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category- you can use a number more than once.

1. Education
- Eliminate

2. Environment
- Greatly Decrease

3. Homeland security
- Maintain Status

4. International aid
- Greatly Decrease

5. Medical research
- Greatly Decrease

6. Scientific research
- Greatly Decrease

7. Space exploration
- Slightly Increase

8. United Nations
- Eliminate

9. Welfare
- Greatly Decrease

10. Other or expanded categories
- No Answer

Taxes

Indicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category- you can use a number more than once.

1. Alcohol taxes
- Eliminate

2. Capital gains taxes
- Eliminate

3. Cigarette taxes
- Eliminate

4. Corporate taxes
- Eliminate

5. Gasoline taxes
- Maintain Status

6. Income taxes (low-income families)
- Greatly Decrease

7. Income taxes (middle-income families)
- Greatly Decrease

8. Income taxes (high-income families)
- Greatly Decrease

9. Other or expanded categories
- No Answer

10. Do you support the elimination of the federal estate tax?
- Yes

11. Do you support requiring the federal budget to be balanced each year?
- Yes

12. Do you support using government funds in an effort to stimulate and improve the economy?
- No

13. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Business and Employment

1. Do you support privatizing elements of Social Security?
- Yes

2. Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
- Yes

3. Do you support increasing the federal minimum wage?
- No

4. Do you support the ability of workers to unionize?
- Yes

5. Do you support federal funding for job-training programs that retrain displaced workers?
- No

6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Campaign Finance and Government Reform

1. Do you support increasing the amount individuals are permitted to contribute to federal campaigns?
- Yes

2. Should Congress regulate indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- No

3. Do you support removing all contribution limits on federal campaigns?
- Yes

4. Should candidates for federal office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
- No

5. Do you support giving the President the power of the line item veto for items concerning appropriations?
- No

6. Do you support limiting the President's ability to define how legislation is applied through the use of signing statements?
- Yes

7. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Crime

1. Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
- Yes

2. Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related training and job-placement assistance when released?
- Yes

3. Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with substance abuse treatment?
- Yes

4. Do you support reduced prison sentences for non-violent offenders?
- Yes

5. Do you support mandatory prison sentences for selling illegal drugs?
- Yes

6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Education

1. Do you support federal education standards and testing requirements for K-12 students?
- No

2. Do you support federal funding for universal pre-K programs?
- No

3. Do you support federal funding for charter schools?
- No

4. Do you support federal funding for K-12 school vouchers?
- No

5. Do you support the federal government providing college students with financial aid?
- No

6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Environment and Energy

1. Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
- No

2. Do you support international emissions targets aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
- No

3. Do you support allowing energy producers to trade carbon credits under a "cap and trade" system?
- No

4. Do you support strengthening fuel efficiency standards on all gasoline and diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport utility vehicles?
- No

5. Do you support domestic oil exploration in federally-protected areas?
- Yes

6. Do you support federal funding for the development of alternative energy?
- No

7. Do you support the development of nuclear reactors?
- Yes

8. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Gun

1. Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
- No

2. Do you believe that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individual citizens to own guns?
- Yes

3. Do you support allowing individuals to carry concealed guns?
- Yes

4. Do you support a ban on assault rifles?
- No

5. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Health

1. Do you support a publicly-administered health insurance option?
- No

2. Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
- Yes

3. Should the federal government expand eligibility for tax-free medical savings accounts?
- Yes

4. Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
- Yes

5. Do you support relaxing regulations on the importation of prescription drugs?
- Yes

6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Immigration

1. Do you support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants?
- No

2. Do you support decreasing the number of legal immigrants allowed into the country?
- No

3. Do you support establishing English as the official national language?
- Yes

4. Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
- Yes

5. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

International Policy

1. Do you support United States military action in Afghanistan?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support increasing military assistance for Afghanistan?
- No Answer

3. Do you support increasing economic development assistance for Afghanistan?
- No Answer

4. Should the United States continue to strike suspected terrorist targets in Pakistan?
- No Answer

5. Do you support granting aid to countries when it is in the security interests of the United States?
- Yes

6. Should the United States support the creation of a Palestinian state?
- No

7. Do you support increasing sanctions on Iran if it continues to defy United Nations mandates?
- Yes

8. Do you support the withdrawal of United States troops from Iraq?
- No Answer

9. Do you support the United States' involvement in free trade agreements?
- Yes

10. Other or expanded principles
- I, like most Americans, do not understand the military actions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. These actions should be either explained rationally and adequately, or ended.

Social

1. Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
- Yes

2. Do you support allowing openly-gay men and women to serve in the United States military?
- No

3. Do you support federal funding for embryonic stem cell research?
- No

4. Should the federal government end affirmative action programs?
- Yes

5. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer

Legislative Priorities

Please explain in a total of 100 words or less, your top two or three priorities if elected. If they require additional funding for implementation, please explain how you would obtain this funding.
- 1. The taxation, regulation, and government sponsored litigation of the American people must be greatly reduced, so that our economy can produce jobs and prosperity. 2. Profligate government spending must end and the federal budget must be balanced. 3. American energy industries - nuclear, coal, oil, natural gas, hydroelectric, wind, solar, and other technologies - should be freed of most government regulations and allowed to compete without government subsidies or government suppression. We must allow our engineers to build the energy industry that we need, without taxpayer expense.

Endorsements
Former Rep. Ron Paul
Life & Liberty PAC
Speeches

Economics of Oregon, District 4

Nov. 2, 2016Press Release
Articles

The Register-Guard - Few Sparks Fly This Time in Race for Congress

Oct. 20, 2014

By Saul Hubbard The first two contests between Democratic U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio and his GOP challenger Art Robinson for Oregon's Fourth Congressional District were all-out brawls. But the third go-around between them is ending with a fizzle. After losing to DeFazio by 20 percentage points in 2012, this year's election always was going to be an uphill fight for Robinson. The Cave Junction chemist and Oregon Republican Party chairman has struggled to raise campaign funds, receiving contributions worth $475,000 through Sept. 30, less than half what he raised during each of the previous two full cycles. Moreover, Robinson hasn't benefited from much outside spending this time around by Robert Mercer, the New York hedge fund manager who spent a combined $1.2 million in 2010 and 2012 on television attack ads criticizing DeFazio. Because he feels that he's been misrepresented by DeFazio as a right-wing extremist with unorthodox views on public education and nuclear energy, among other topics, Robinson's campaign has focused on projecting a softer, more moderate image this cycle. Robinson's two television commercials so far highlight his role as a family man, raising his six kids alone after his wife died, and his support for local control in public education and higher teacher pay. Neither mentions DeFazio. "I don't think my personal views have changed," Robinson said. "There's been a difference between my views and what has been presented to the public." Meanwhile, DeFazio, who campaigned aggressively against Robinson in their first two contests, hadn't spent the bulk of the $1.1 million he's raised as of Sept. 30. His main television and radio ad this year is a decidedly mild spot that compares his fights in Congress to his high school wrestling days. It ignores Robinson. The campaign "isn't negative (this year) because we don't have out-of-state super PACs financing negative ads for Robinson's campaign," DeFazio said. Stagnation and urine samples Both candidates still are quick to criticize each other in interviews and public appearances, however. Robinson focuses heavily on DeFazio's 27-year tenure in Congress, which he says is "ridiculous." "Our Founding Fathers imagined legislators who would suffer through two-year terms and get back to work," he said. Because he isn't interested in a long career in office, Robinson says he wouldn't be subverted by the dogma of party politics and would "vote only on the issue." Robinson also defends a mass mailer he sent out earlier this year requesting urine samples from thousands of random Oregonians, which was widely ridiculed in Democratic circles. The candidate said he's received samples from 7,000 people, which will be used in his research into early detection of diseases, including breast cancer. "It's a project I began 40 years ago, and it has started an entire research field," he said. DeFazio points to Robinson's statement last November that he would have liked to have seen the federal government shutdown "play out further" as a clear sign that Robinson's "remake" is illusory. "That shows me he intends to throw in with the 40 or 50 ultra-right-wing tea partiers (in Congress) who pressured (GOP House Speaker) John Boehner into the shutdown," he said. "It puts him in line with the least productive people in Congress." DeFazio also isn't willing to let go of the now-infamous passages in Robinson's "Access to Energy" newsletters, mostly written in the 1990s, which compared public education to child abuse and suggested that nuclear waste could be disposed of safely by mixing it into the foundations of residential structures or by sprink­ling it over the ocean. "There's no misinterpreting his positions before he was a candidate," DeFazio said. "Art has a 20-year history of vicious attacks on public education." Robinson: Let freedom ring Robinson says he would bring a strong free market view to Congress. He sees government bureaucracies and over-regulation as the key reasons that costs for health care, energy and college tuition all have exploded in recent years. Robinson also favors scant government restriction on natural resource extraction. He supports DeFazio's efforts to increase logging in Oregon's federally owned west-side forests, as well as a liquefied natural gas export terminal in Coos Bay and a proposal to ship Midwestern coal through Oregon to reach the Asian markets. A skeptic of human-caused global warming, Robinson opposes various efforts and proposals to reduce the country's carbon emissions. "There's a tremendous amount at stake for a lot of the human race in this idea of us burning less hydrocarbons," he said. "If you propose that, you have to be right. "In Congress, I should have nothing to say about how our energy is produced, outside of creating adequate regulatory agencies," he added. "We don't have national debates about how Intel is going to build its next chip. We don't know enough about it." On public education, Robinson supports giving much more control to local communities and distributing federal funding on a per-student basis -- rather than according to existing formulas that try to prioritize high-poverty schools. He said he also opposes federal Common Core standards. "When you start running education from the top down, you lose a lot, including competition between the school districts, which is key." Incumbent defends his record DeFazio says he's running again both to work on his own goals and to help block "radical, wrong-headed proposals" being advanced in the Republican-led House. Those include bills that would "gut environmental laws under the premise that it will create jobs" and efforts to repeal the federal Affordable Health Care program with no plans to replace it -- which he said could cause up to 500,000 Oregonians to lose their insurance. Asked to point to recent successes, DeFazio notes his work in securing steady federal funding for the dredging of small ports, including several in Southwest Oregon, as part of a larger water resources bill. He hopes to make headway soon on his much-debated logging bill and on a long-term transportation spending bill. While Congress has been divided over how to fund the transportation bill, DeFazio is proposing eliminating the federal gas tax at the pump and imposing the tax instead at the refinery level. While the current federal gas tax has stayed flat at 18.3 cents a gallon since 1993, DeFazio's proposed wholesale tax would be tied to inflation. Transportation funding "is an incredibly basic government function," he said. DeFazio also is supporting legislation that would slash the interest rate on student loans to the same rate that banks pay when borrowing from the Federal Reserve, currently 0.75 percent. The legislation would be paid for by increasing taxes on people making more than $1 million a year. Current interest rates on student loans are "outrageous," DeFazio said. "Studies show that people don't enter the homeowners' market when they're shouldering huge debt. "It's a serious weight on our economic growth."

Jefferson Public Radio - Candidates For Oregon's 4th District Square Off

Oct. 16, 2014

By Rachael McDonal Incumbent Democratic Congressman Peter DeFazio and his Republican challenger Art Robinson traded barbs Wednesday night in a debate at the University of Oregon Law School in Eugene. They were joined by Green Party candidate Michael Bielstein discussing topics including funding for rural counties, liquefied natural gas terminals, oil trains, climate change and education. This is the third try by Art Robinson to unseat Peter DeFazio who's been in Congress for 27-years. Robinson claims there's a divide between the working class and the political class and he says "career politicians" have caused economic inequality. Robinson: "We need to get rid of this cycle of career politicians and the corporate and Wall Street people and special interests that fund their campaigns and keep them in office. He's trying now for 15 terms. Are we kidding? It's time to make a change." Congressman DeFazio spent a lot of time trying to expose Robinson's more controversial statements from the past. DeFazio: "Well, I happen to believe in human-caused climate change and my opponent Mr. Robinson is one of the foremost deniers of that science. In fact, he has called the science a "bogus-fear scenario". Robinson expressed doubt during the debate that climate change is human caused, saying that the earth goes through natural cycles of cooling and warming. Green Party Candidate Michael Bielstein had this to say about climate change. Bielstein: "We are treating the resource of the atmosphere as if it's a big toilet. We can burn all the carbon dioxide we want and put it in the air and do that at no charge. I say we charge people for the carbon dioxide they put in the air." Bielstein, a Corvallis City Councilor, called for free college tuition, an end to wars, single payer health care and a 15-dollar an hour minimum wage. Art Robinson is a chemist from Cave Junction. At Wednesday's debate he called for education reform, term limits and less government regulations. Congressman Peter DeFazio touted his record of independence and ability to get things done despite Congressional gridlock. Wednesday's debate was sponsored by the City Club of Eugene and Lane County League of Women Voters. DeFazio and Robinson will have another debate in Coos Bay next week.

Washington - In Oregon, Chemist offers GOP a Unifying Formula

Jun. 3, 2012

By Ralph Z. Hallow Republicans looking to ease the friction among party stalwarts, tea party activists and Ron Paul supporters headed into this year's election say they may have found a model of unity in Art Robinson, a scientist who is the GOP candidate for a congressional seat representing an Oregon district. Mr. Robinson, a former CalTech chemist and home-schooling curriculum author who became a prominent skeptic of taxpayer-funded research based on his own experiences, has hit the kinds of notes that ring well with the limited-government tea party and with libertarian Paul forces. "Art's grass-roots campaign challenges the Washington, D.C., cabal of insider politics and is gaining momentum for a very good reason," saidAllen Alley, chairman of the Oregon Republican Party. "There's a moral and political rudder, a core set of beliefs, that come through. The more you listen, the more his good sense comes through." But even more, Republicans hope Mr. Robinson can be a template for the broader national party. Many activists fret that Republicans cannot win the presidential election in November if they put up a candidate in a fractured party against a Democratic Party unified behind President Obama.

Events

2020

Oct. 5
Monday Meet & Greet with Lily, Duane & Art

Mon 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM PDT

Taprock Northwest Grill Grants Pass Grants Pass, OR