Share on WeChat
https://www.powervoter.us:443/anthony_brindisi
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.

Anthony Brindisi

D

Won the General, 2012 New York State Assembly District 119

New York U.S. House, District 22 (2019 - Present)

Quick Facts
Personal Details

Caucuses/Former Committees

Former Member, Aging Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Economic Development, Job Creation, Commerce and Industry Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Education Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Governmental Employees Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Higher Education Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Chair, Subcommittee on Students with Special Needs, New York State Assembly

Former Chair, Subcommittee on Volunteer Emergency Services, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Transportation Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Veterans Affairs Committee, New York State Assembly

Education

  • Attended, Mohawk Valley Community College
  • BS, History, Siena College
  • JD, Albany Law School, Union University, 2004

Professional Experience

  • Attended, Mohawk Valley Community College
  • BS, History, Siena College
  • JD, Albany Law School, Union University, 2004
  • Attorney, Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, and Pearlman, Limited Liability Partnership, 2004-present

Political Experience

  • Attended, Mohawk Valley Community College
  • BS, History, Siena College
  • JD, Albany Law School, Union University, 2004
  • Attorney, Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, and Pearlman, Limited Liability Partnership, 2004-present
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, District 22, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, New York, District 22, 2018, 2020
  • Assembly Member, New York State Assembly, 2012-2019

Former Committees/Caucuses

Former Member, Aging Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Economic Development, Job Creation, Commerce and Industry Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Education Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Governmental Employees Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Higher Education Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Chair, Subcommittee on Students with Special Needs, New York State Assembly

Former Chair, Subcommittee on Volunteer Emergency Services, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Transportation Committee, New York State Assembly

Former Member, Veterans Affairs Committee, New York State Assembly

Current Legislative Committees

Member, Agriculture

Member, Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research

Member, Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity

Member, Subcommittee on Health (Veterans' Affairs)

Member, Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture

Member, Veterans' Affairs

Religious, Civic, and other Memberships

  • Attended, Mohawk Valley Community College
  • BS, History, Siena College
  • JD, Albany Law School, Union University, 2004
  • Attorney, Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, and Pearlman, Limited Liability Partnership, 2004-present
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, District 22, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, New York, District 22, 2018, 2020
  • Assembly Member, New York State Assembly, 2012-2019
  • Member, Northern District of New York, Federal District Bar, 2004-present
  • Former Board Member, Children's Museum of History, Natural Science, Science, & Technology, Utica
  • Former Board Member, Greater Utica Community Food Bank
  • Member, New York State Bar, present
  • Former Member, Utica School Board

Other Info

Spouse's Occupation:

Biology Professor

Policy Positions

2021

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes

2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Unknown Position

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes

Crime

Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position

Defense

Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No

3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position

Energy and Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No

2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position

Trade

Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes

2019

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes

2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- No

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes

Energy & Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Unknown Position

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No

Marijuana

Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position

Congress Bills
Endorsements
Claudia Tenney
Speeches
Articles

Syracuse - Rep. Anthony Brindisi: We must protect the rule of law (commentary)

Dec. 17, 2019

By Anthony Brindisi The rule of law is what holds our great Country together. It is more important than any one person, slogan, or politician. It is what makes us an enduring nation. In Congress, the rule of law is bound by the pages of our Constitution. Whether we realize it or not, the Constitution is part of our daily lives. It is the constitutional framework that guides our local laws in every statehouse and legislative body across the Country. Our founding fathers, who drafted the Constitution, created a federal government with three unique and equal branches, designed specifically to be a check on the other, not a blind partner. In other words, a true and sustaining government only works if its power is divided, people-driven, and painstakingly checked. Congress has a duty to work together with the President. The catch is--it must never be obliged to obey any president, from either party, if doing so ignores the rule of law. As anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall after the Constitutional Convention of 1787, one person asked Benjamin Franklin "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" Franklin responded, "A republic, if you can keep it." James Madison, our fourth President, and the "Father of the Constitution," explained in the Federalist Papers that each branch checks the power of the other two. That's how our Republic endures. It is the greatest honor of my life to serve as a member of Congress, and this impeachment process has caused me great pain. Why? Because I've successfully partnered with this President to improve the lives of many American families. He has signed my bills into law, one of the few freshmen he's honored in this way. And we are not finished yet. President Trump signed my first bill into law to extend key housing and transportation programs to our nation's veterans who need them. I worked together with the President to push a new trade deal with Canada and Mexico. Soon he will sign into law major provisions I championed in the National Defense Authorization Act including huge support for Rome Labs, and my SPOONSS Act that will create jobs by requiring the military to buy American-made flatware from Central New York. We have also passed the first-ever fentanyl sanctions legislation, cracking down on illicit drug traffickers in China and Mexico that are flooding our streets with synthetic opioids. You see, when tethered to the rule of law--a force for good--President Trump and both parties in Congress can get great things done. President Trump is my President too. I've always said I would work with him to get things done, as I have demonstrated. However, I will always put Country first and stand up for what I believe in when I think he is wrong. When it comes to impeachment, I was reluctant to pursue this path. I was one of the last to endorse the impeachment inquiry and have held back judgment until I reviewed all the evidence. I have been critical of members on both sides who were quick to cast their judgment condemning the President before all the evidence was in or who rush to defend the President from all accusations. I have spent weeks reviewing transcripts, talking to Constitutional law experts and reading scholarly articles about impeachment. I've read thousands of emails and heard hundreds of phone calls from constituents to my office. There is little doubt, the President made a grave error--intended or not--in his "perfect" call with Ukraine. The fact that the President made a political request to a foreign leader of a troubled country with the intention for it to impact an American rival is beyond disappointing. In fact, it is unconstitutional. I took an oath to defend the Constitution. What the President has--on national television--admitted to doing is not something I can pretend is normal behavior. It is also wrong for the President to block the testimony of key subpoenaed witnesses that had direct knowledge of the Administration's actions. There is a difference between working with a President and checking that same President. My job is to do both. I know some people will be angry at my decision, but I was elected to do what is right, not politically safe. I believe there is sufficient evidence presented to move forward with a trial in the Senate, and it will be their job to decide whether the President should be removed from office. No one comes to Washington or spends hours away from their young family with the goal of impeachment. But if we care about the rule of law, the scales of justice, and the future generations we might shape, we must put our faith in the arc of history and our Constitution.

Decision to self-quarantine for coronavirus on March 20, 2020

Jan. 1, 1900

Brindisi announced on March 19, 2020, that he will self-quarantine at home after he was in close contact with one of two congressmen to test positive for coronavirus. Coronavirus pandemic Select a topic from the dropdown below to learn more.Political responses overviewState reopening plansDocumenting America's Path to RecoveryDaily updatesElection changesChanges to vote-by-mail and absentee voting proceduresFederal responsesState responsesState executive ordersStay-at-home ordersMultistate agreementsNon-governmental reopening plansEvictions and foreclosures policiesTravel restrictionsEnacted state legislationState legislative session changesSchool closuresState court closuresInmate releasesLocal government responsesDiagnosed or quarantined politiciansBallot measure changesArguments about government responsesThe 1918 influenza pandemicPandemic Response Accountability CommitteeUnemployment filingsLawsuitsSubmit COVID-19, also known as coronavirus disease 2019.

Events

2020

Sep. 30
Virtual Concert in Support of Congressman Brindisi

Wed 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM EDT

Utica, NY

Sep. 26
Brindisi for Congress lawn sign "curbside pickup"

Sat 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM EDT

508 Court Street, Binghamton, NY

Jul. 7
Tele-Town Hall with Rep. Brindisi

Tue 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM EDT