Anthony Brindisi
DWon the General, 2012 New York State Assembly District 119
New York U.S. House, District 22 (2019 - Present)
To be claimed
Former Member, Aging Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Economic Development, Job Creation, Commerce and Industry Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Education Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Governmental Employees Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Higher Education Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Students with Special Needs, New York State Assembly
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Volunteer Emergency Services, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Transportation Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Veterans Affairs Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Aging Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Economic Development, Job Creation, Commerce and Industry Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Education Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Governmental Employees Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Higher Education Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Students with Special Needs, New York State Assembly
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Volunteer Emergency Services, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Transportation Committee, New York State Assembly
Former Member, Veterans Affairs Committee, New York State Assembly
Member, Agriculture
Member, Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research
Member, Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Member, Subcommittee on Health (Veterans' Affairs)
Member, Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture
Member, Veterans' Affairs
Spouse's Occupation:
Biology Professor
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- No
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position
Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/13/2019 Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/19/2019 Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 13.
Tracker:Type: resolution Chamber: lower
Type: resolution Chamber: lower
Type: bill Chamber: lower
By Anthony Brindisi The rule of law is what holds our great Country together. It is more important than any one person, slogan, or politician. It is what makes us an enduring nation. In Congress, the rule of law is bound by the pages of our Constitution. Whether we realize it or not, the Constitution is part of our daily lives. It is the constitutional framework that guides our local laws in every statehouse and legislative body across the Country. Our founding fathers, who drafted the Constitution, created a federal government with three unique and equal branches, designed specifically to be a check on the other, not a blind partner. In other words, a true and sustaining government only works if its power is divided, people-driven, and painstakingly checked. Congress has a duty to work together with the President. The catch is--it must never be obliged to obey any president, from either party, if doing so ignores the rule of law. As anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall after the Constitutional Convention of 1787, one person asked Benjamin Franklin "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" Franklin responded, "A republic, if you can keep it." James Madison, our fourth President, and the "Father of the Constitution," explained in the Federalist Papers that each branch checks the power of the other two. That's how our Republic endures. It is the greatest honor of my life to serve as a member of Congress, and this impeachment process has caused me great pain. Why? Because I've successfully partnered with this President to improve the lives of many American families. He has signed my bills into law, one of the few freshmen he's honored in this way. And we are not finished yet. President Trump signed my first bill into law to extend key housing and transportation programs to our nation's veterans who need them. I worked together with the President to push a new trade deal with Canada and Mexico. Soon he will sign into law major provisions I championed in the National Defense Authorization Act including huge support for Rome Labs, and my SPOONSS Act that will create jobs by requiring the military to buy American-made flatware from Central New York. We have also passed the first-ever fentanyl sanctions legislation, cracking down on illicit drug traffickers in China and Mexico that are flooding our streets with synthetic opioids. You see, when tethered to the rule of law--a force for good--President Trump and both parties in Congress can get great things done. President Trump is my President too. I've always said I would work with him to get things done, as I have demonstrated. However, I will always put Country first and stand up for what I believe in when I think he is wrong. When it comes to impeachment, I was reluctant to pursue this path. I was one of the last to endorse the impeachment inquiry and have held back judgment until I reviewed all the evidence. I have been critical of members on both sides who were quick to cast their judgment condemning the President before all the evidence was in or who rush to defend the President from all accusations. I have spent weeks reviewing transcripts, talking to Constitutional law experts and reading scholarly articles about impeachment. I've read thousands of emails and heard hundreds of phone calls from constituents to my office. There is little doubt, the President made a grave error--intended or not--in his "perfect" call with Ukraine. The fact that the President made a political request to a foreign leader of a troubled country with the intention for it to impact an American rival is beyond disappointing. In fact, it is unconstitutional. I took an oath to defend the Constitution. What the President has--on national television--admitted to doing is not something I can pretend is normal behavior. It is also wrong for the President to block the testimony of key subpoenaed witnesses that had direct knowledge of the Administration's actions. There is a difference between working with a President and checking that same President. My job is to do both. I know some people will be angry at my decision, but I was elected to do what is right, not politically safe. I believe there is sufficient evidence presented to move forward with a trial in the Senate, and it will be their job to decide whether the President should be removed from office. No one comes to Washington or spends hours away from their young family with the goal of impeachment. But if we care about the rule of law, the scales of justice, and the future generations we might shape, we must put our faith in the arc of history and our Constitution.
Brindisi announced on March 19, 2020, that he will self-quarantine at home after he was in close contact with one of two congressmen to test positive for coronavirus. Coronavirus pandemic Select a topic from the dropdown below to learn more.Political responses overviewState reopening plansDocumenting America's Path to RecoveryDaily updatesElection changesChanges to vote-by-mail and absentee voting proceduresFederal responsesState responsesState executive ordersStay-at-home ordersMultistate agreementsNon-governmental reopening plansEvictions and foreclosures policiesTravel restrictionsEnacted state legislationState legislative session changesSchool closuresState court closuresInmate releasesLocal government responsesDiagnosed or quarantined politiciansBallot measure changesArguments about government responsesThe 1918 influenza pandemicPandemic Response Accountability CommitteeUnemployment filingsLawsuitsSubmit COVID-19, also known as coronavirus disease 2019.
Sat 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM EDT
508 Court Street, Binghamton, NY
Tue 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM EDT