Bill Pascrell Jr.
DRunning, 2024 New Jersey U.S. House District 9, Primary Election
Won the General, 2022 New Jersey U.S. House District 9
New Jersey U.S. House, District 9 (1996 - Present)
To be claimed
Member, Congressional Caucus on Baltic Issues, United States Congress, present
Member, Congressional Law Enforcement Caucus, United States Congress, present
Member, Congressional Wildlife Refuge Caucus, United States Congress, present
Member, Historic Preservation Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Member, House Cancer Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Member, International Workers Rights Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Co-Chair, Italian-American Congressional Delegation, United States Congress, present
Member, Ways and Means Committee, United State House of Representatives, present
Former Member, 9/11 Commission Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Budget Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Homeland Security, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Small Business, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Community College Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Congressional Arts Caucus, United States Congress
Former Co-Chair, Congressional Brain Injury Task Force, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on Hellenic Issues, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Affairs, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on Sri Lanka and Sri Lankan Issues, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Coalition for Autism Research and Education, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Fire Services Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Friends of Animals Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Heart and Stroke Coalition, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Humanities Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Human Rights Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Labor and Working Families Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Manufacturing Task Force, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Pakistan Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Public Broadcasting Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Steel Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Sudan Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Task Force on Tobacco and Health, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Vision Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Working Group on Parkinson's Disease, United States Congress
Former Member, Education and the Workforce Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Former Mayors Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Health Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Trade, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, United States House of Representatives
Member, Congressional Caucus on Baltic Issues, United States Congress, present
Member, Congressional Law Enforcement Caucus, United States Congress, present
Member, Congressional Wildlife Refuge Caucus, United States Congress, present
Member, Historic Preservation Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Member, House Cancer Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Member, International Workers Rights Caucus, United States House of Representatitves, present
Co-Chair, Italian-American Congressional Delegation, United States Congress, present
Member, Ways and Means Committee, United State House of Representatives, present
Former Member, 9/11 Commission Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Budget Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Homeland Security, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Small Business, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Community College Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Congressional Arts Caucus, United States Congress
Former Co-Chair, Congressional Brain Injury Task Force, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on Hellenic Issues, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Affairs, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Caucus on Sri Lanka and Sri Lankan Issues, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Coalition for Autism Research and Education, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Fire Services Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Friends of Animals Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Heart and Stroke Coalition, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Humanities Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Human Rights Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Labor and Working Families Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Manufacturing Task Force, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Pakistan Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Public Broadcasting Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Steel Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Sudan Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Task Force on Tobacco and Health, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Vision Caucus, United States Congress
Former Member, Congressional Working Group on Parkinson's Disease, United States Congress
Former Member, Education and the Workforce Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Former Mayors Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Health Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, United States House of Representatives
Chair, Subcommittee on Oversight (Ways and Means)
Member, Subcommittee on Social Security
Member, Ways and Means Committee
Astrological Sign:
Aquarius
— Awards:
Outstanding Legislator of the Year, Department of New Jersey Jewish War Veterans
Mayor of the Year, New Jersey Conference of Mayors, 1996
Legislator of the Year, New Jersey Chamber of Commerce
— Number of Grandchildren:
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- No
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- No
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- No
1. Do you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-life?
- Pro-choice
2. Should abortion be legal only within the first trimester of pregnancy?
- No
3. Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
- Yes
4. Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
- Yes
5. Should federal subsidies be prohibited from being used for abortion procedures?
- Yes
1. Agriculture
- Maintain Status
2. Arts
- Slightly Increase
3. Defense
- Maintain Status
4. Intelligence operations
- Slightly Increase
5. Military hardware
- Maintain Status
6. National missile defense
- Slightly Decrease
7. Salary and benefits for active duty personnel
- Slightly Increase
8. Programs to improve troop retention rates
- Slightly Increase
9. Research and development of new weapons
- Maintain Status
1. Education
- Slightly Increase
2. Environment
- Slightly Increase
3. Homeland security
- Slightly Increase
4. International aid
- Maintain Status
5. Medical research
- Maintain Status
6. Scientific research
- Slightly Increase
7. Space exploration
- Maintain Status
8. United Nations
- Maintain Status
9. Welfare
- Maintain Status
10. Other or expanded categories
- No Answer
11. Alcohol taxes
- Maintain Status
12. Capital gains taxes
- Slightly Decrease
13. Cigarette taxes
- Slightly Increase
14. Corporate taxes
- Slightly Decrease
15. Gasoline taxes
- Maintain Status
16. Income taxes (low-income families)
- Slightly Decrease
17. Income taxes (middle-income families)
- Slightly Decrease
18. Income taxes (high-income families)
- Slightly Increase
19. Do you support the elimination of the federal estate tax?
- No
20. Do you support requiring the federal budget to be balanced each year?
- Yes
21. Do you support using government funds in an effort to stimulate and improve the economy?
- Yes
1. Do you support privatizing elements of Social Security?
- No
2. Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
- No
3. Do you support increasing the federal minimum wage?
- Yes
4. Do you support the ability of workers to unionize?
- Yes
5. Do you support federal funding for job-training programs that retrain displaced workers?
- Yes
6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer
1. Do you support increasing the amount individuals are permitted to contribute to federal campaigns?
- No
2. Should Congress regulate indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
3. Do you support removing all contribution limits on federal campaigns?
- No
4. Should candidates for federal office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
- Yes
5. Do you support giving the President the power of the line item veto for items concerning appropriations?
- No
6. Do you support limiting the President's ability to define how legislation is applied through the use of signing statements?
- Yes
7. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer
1. Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
- Yes
2. Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related training and job-placement assistance when released?
- Yes
3. Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with substance abuse treatment?
- Yes
4. Do you support reduced prison sentences for non-violent offenders?
- Yes
5. Do you support mandatory prison sentences for selling illegal drugs?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal education standards and testing requirements for K-12 students?
- Yes
2. Do you support federal funding for universal pre-K programs?
- Yes
3. Do you support federal funding for charter schools?
- Yes
4. Do you support federal funding for K-12 school vouchers?
- No
5. Do you support the federal government providing college students with financial aid?
- Yes
6. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer
1. Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
- Yes
2. Do you support international emissions targets aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
- Yes
3. Do you support allowing energy producers to trade carbon credits under a "cap and trade" system?
- Yes
4. Do you support strengthening fuel efficiency standards on all gasoline and diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport utility vehicles?
- Yes
5. Do you support domestic oil exploration in federally-protected areas?
- No
6. Do you support federal funding for the development of alternative energy?
- Yes
7. Do you support the development of nuclear reactors?
- Yes
8. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer
1. Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
- Yes
2. Do you believe that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individual citizens to own guns?
- Yes
3. Do you support allowing individuals to carry concealed guns?
- No
4. Do you support a ban on assault rifles?
- Yes
5. Other or expanded principles
- No Answer
1. Do you support a publicly-administered health insurance option?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
- Yes
3. Should the federal government expand eligibility for tax-free medical savings accounts?
- No
4. Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
- No
5. Do you support relaxing regulations on the importation of prescription drugs?
- No
1. Do you support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants?
- Yes
2. Do you support decreasing the number of legal immigrants allowed into the country?
- No
3. Do you support establishing English as the official national language?
- No
4. Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
- No
1. Do you support United States military action in Afghanistan?
- Yes
2. Do you support increasing military assistance for Afghanistan?
- Yes
3. Do you support increasing economic development assistance for Afghanistan?
- Yes
4. Should the United States continue to strike suspected terrorist targets in Pakistan?
- Yes
5. Do you support granting aid to countries when it is in the security interests of the United States?
- Yes
6. Should the United States support the creation of a Palestinian state?
- Yes
7. Do you support increasing sanctions on Iran if it continues to defy United Nations mandates?
- Yes
8. Do you support the withdrawal of United States troops from Iraq?
- Yes
9. Do you support the United States' involvement in free trade agreements?
- Yes
1. Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
- Yes
2. Do you support allowing openly-gay men and women to serve in the United States military?
- Yes
3. Do you support federal funding for embryonic stem cell research?
- Yes
4. Should the federal government end affirmative action programs?
- No
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- No
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position
Latest Action: House - 06/20/2019 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/19/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Tracker:By William Pascrell In July, at age 83, Rep. Bill Pascrell was rushed to St. Joseph's Hospital in downtown Paterson, where doctors cracked open his chest and saved his life with bypass surgery. Three months later, Pascrell is not just back in action, but sounds like an excited teenager the night before the big game. Sure, give the doctors some credit. But what's got Pascrell dancing is the New York Times investigation detailing the sleazy stunts that President Trump used to avoid paying his fair share of taxes, to enrich himself and his family, and to build a myth of himself as a tycoon. That's just what Pascrell has been saying for years, while serving as point-man in the Democrats' effort to force Trump to release his returns. And now, he says, he has an even deeper worry: Trump's enormous personal debt of more than $400 million, to parties unknown. That could leave him vulnerable to blackmail and other pressure tactics. "How has he been compromised because of that debt?" Pascrell asks. "In Russia they have a term for it -- Kompromat," he says. "I'm going to be relentless about this. I'm going to use my chairmanship aggressively." Those personal loans are the most important part of this story, and it often escapes notice, because it's so infuriating and easy to understand that we have a president who would cheat on his taxes and use his office to enrich himself and his family. Bad as that is, it come as no surprise. Grifters are gonna grift, and even make baby grifters. The scary part is that $421 million in loans that Trump has personally guaranteed, $300 million which come due during a possible second term. The Times did not say who holds that debt, and Pascrell's office doesn't know either. Trump's biggest creditor is Deutsche Bank, but it's not clear if the bank is holding these particular loans. And a bank could act as a middleman in any case, while keeping the real source of the money secret. That's one reason that Pascrell is still pressing for release of Trump's full tax returns, which may offer some answers. "Can we figure out if this is money laundering?" said one source in Pascrell's office. To put it bluntly: Is Vladimir Putin holding this string? Does Trump cozy up to authoritarian rulers because one or more of them has a piece of this loan? David Ignatius, a foreign affairs columnist for the Washington Post, was told by "top former intelligence officials" that Trump would be unlikely to get security clearance if he weren't president, given the risk that foreign players could have powerful leverage over him. Voters, he argues, should ask themselves this question: "Is this man vulnerable to foreign pressure because of his large debts coming due over the next four years?" For Pascrell, getting Trump's tax returns has been an obsession since 2016. Pascrell's staff has assembled a list of 38 specific actions he's taken to force the issue, like writing letters, holding hearings, and passing resolutions. The Times investigation pushed open new doors after all this time, turbo-charging Pascrell's passions just as he takes over as chairman of the key subcommittee looking into this issue, the oversight subcommittee of the powerful Ways & Means committee. On Thursday, he sent out a tweet that sounds like he was shadow-boxing when he wrote it. "Pascrellian. Pas-krel-ien. Adjective. "Pugilistic in nature; suffers no fools and corrupt actors; irascible to disrespect, real and perceived." Synonym: New Jerseyan." He plans hearings within the next few weeks and has invited the head of the Internal Revenue Service, Charles Rettig, to testify. Fat chance that he'll show up and try to explain why the IRS has taken a decade to audit Trump's returns, giving him a fake excuse to hold them back. "Either the IRS is asleep at the wheel, or they don't have enough people to uncover the fraud," Pascrell says. "If I'm working out in Montana or something, I'd have to say I've been had, that this guy has taken me for four years and hasn't paid his share. What has the IRS done about this?" Good question, but he knows the answer. Republicans have gutted the IRS, slashing its enforcement budget by nearly 40 percent over the last decade, as the number of returns grew by 10 percent. The number of audits of people reporting incomes of $10 million or more has dropped by about three-fourths, according to IRS data. For rich grifters like Trump, it's party time. We may be in the final weeks of our torment with this impostor as our president. But you never know, as we found out in 2016. So, I'm glad Pascrell has lost none of his fire, even in his ninth decade, even with fresh scars on his chest. As long as we have a president like Trump, I'm beyond grateful for pit bulls like Pascrell.
By Bill Pascrell President Donald Trump's reported desecration of American soldiers who fell in World War I may rank among the worst slurs he has uttered in office. But Trump's hostility toward troops and veterans is not new. Trump has compiled a record in word and deed that is derisive to the health of service members, especially those who have suffered some of the worst wounds in action. Despite Trump's avowed affection, his administration has repeatedly attempted to slash benefits for veterans. Under current law, veterans are eligible to receive generous disability compensation the day after being discharged or released from the hospital or rehabilitation. Importantly, when disabilities worsen, veterans have wide leeway to apply for increased financial support. In each of its last three Veterans Affairs Department budgets, the administration has tried to narrow veterans' ability to apply for disability benefits. Under these proposals, eligibility would be limited only to cases of injury occurring during combat or training, lessening the time veterans have to obtain disability assistance. Similarly, Trump's attempts to gut Medicaid are devastating to veterans. Trump's latest proposed budget trimmed Medicaid by $1.5 trillion over 10 years, an approximate one-quarter cut. Today, nearly one in 10 U.S. veterans -- almost two million in total -- receive Medicaid. While the Democratic House has blocked these changes from being realized, that they are even contemplated is a stunning betrayal. These cuts risk the health of the most in-need veterans, including those who require constant care for traumatic brain injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and other chronic maladies. Not only has Trump sought to slash benefits, but he has presided over a withering of the VA. As of this spring, the department had 50,000 vacancies, a stunning figure that dwarfs the total number of employees in the departments of Education, Energy, Labor, HUD, and State combined. A 2019 VA Inspector General's report found that 96% of VA clinics studied "reported at least one severe occupational shortage" and nearly 40% had 20 severe staffing shortages. These are 50,000 missing doctors, nurses, practitioners, and administrators to serve more than nine million veterans who rely on VA care. Failure to fill these positions has led to the closing of internal, PTSD, ENT and clinics across the country. Even a veteran's woodshop program just outside my own district was shuttered. While the VA's enfeeblement predates Trump, its continued atrophy is by design, as VA Secretary Robert Wilkie all but acknowledged last year when he testified that "I would not be honest with you if I told you that my focus would be filling [department] vacancies." Administration appointees have made existing problems worse by targeting employee benefits and labor protections and pulverizing agency morale with an inexorable push toward privatization, to say nothing of Trump's catastrophic pandemic mismanagement and U.S. Postal Service sabotage that especially hurt veterans. These cuts and systematic inattention fit a tragic pattern, as Trump's remarks in France mirror the contempt he showed for troops injured in Iraq this past January when 100 U.S. troops suffered concussion symptoms following an Iranian airstrike on Al-Asad Air Base in Baghdad. Asked to comment on that attack, Trump dismissed their injuries as headaches and said "No, I don't consider them very serious injuries." In 1998, I co-founded the Congressional Brain Injury Task Force to bring attention to the hidden affliction of traumatic brain injury, or TBI. TBI is a serious injury, and no mere headache. TBI is also a signature injury among service members, putting them at increased risk of long-term health issues including depression, dementia, seizures and problems with social functioning. Nearly 414,000 U.S. service members were diagnosed with TBIs between 2000 and 2019 and more than 185,000 veterans who use VA for their care have been diagnosed with at least one TBI. Congress created the Assisted Living Pilot Program for Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury to help TBI sufferers. After declaring it a success, the Trump administration ended the program in 2017. Following Trump's remarks after the Iranian airstrike, our task force wrote to the Defense Department demanding answers on how many soldiers suffered brain injury. The Inspector General notified us that it would investigate but has provided no more information or follow-up on the extent of soldiers' wounds. Cooperation with this administration, even to aid vets, does not exist. Fixing veteran care is a titanic mission. Congress must provide more support, such as paid family leave. Planning for future and not prior needs is critical where the over-75 veterans' population will double this decade. If we can fund the Defense Department, we can do the same to care for the women and men who bear the wounds of service. That Trump called American soldiers who gave their lives in the cause of freedom "losers" and "suckers" is abhorrent. But his attempts to shrink or steal health benefits from women and injured in service to America may be worse. A veteran himself, Rep. Pascrell has led the advancement of brain injury policy on Capitol Hill to support members of America's armed forces suffering from traumatic brain injuries. Pascrell co-founded the Congressional Traumatic Brain Injury Task Force in 1998 and has served as task force co-chair since its inception. In a previous and widely-circulated op-ed, Rep. Pascrell argued that no one in America has done more to "defund" the police than Donald Trump himself. Today's op-ed highlights a similar hypocrisy of Trump's given his propensity to use the military as a political prop while privately degrading servicemembers and their sacrifices.
The passing of my friend Congressman John Lewis has been a terrible blow. His death at this moment crystalizes the imperative of what was perhaps John's most important life's work: protecting your right to vote. Because there is no question that your sacred right is under grave threat. Almost daily, Donald Trump uses his pulpit to target election officials. He spews conspiracy theories that undermine our elections. And Trump's false claims that millions of Americans vote illegally targets the legitimacy of our entire democracy. Trump's attacks are an extension of the cavalier shouts of "voter fraud" Republicans have been making for ages. Their assertions aren't simply overplayed but made up whole cloth: voter fraud is virtually nonexistent in the United States. (Ironically, perhaps the two most prominent cases of voter fraud in recent years were by a Republican running for Congress in North Carolina, and one of my current GOP colleagues from Kansas who was just indicted.) Trump's attacks on voting come at a precarious moment. This year, Americans in states including Georgia, Kentucky, Texas and Wisconsin have had to wait in line for hours to cast their ballots. Tragically, those images of lines snaking for blocks are not been one-off aberrations, but ones we see year after year. That is because they are not an accident but a product of deliberate design. Across America, local Republican officials routinely close polling stations in urban areas and communities of color. Their purpose is nefarious: to make the process so difficult that people just throw up their hands and don't vote. Republicans have found a partner in their war on voting in the five justicees who form the right-wing bloc of the U.S. Supreme Court. The Robert Court's 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder gutting the Voting Rights Act remains perhaps the most damaging decision in generations. One of the greatest laws Congress has ever enacted, the Voting Rights Act ensured that Black Americans would finally enjoy the right to vote, fulfilling the promise of the Fifteenth Amendment a century after its ratification. John Lewis would say many times that the Voting Rights Act was maybe the proudest achievement of the civil rights movement of which he was an integral part. By preposterously asserting that racial discrimination is a relic of the past, the Supreme Court gave the greenlight to scores of voter restrictions. Indeed, just this month, the justices blocked a landmark ballot initiative in Florida restoring voting rights to released felons that has been held up by a poll tax passed by the Florida legislature. This matters as the COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented challenges for voting. In our state, we just held our first-ever primary conducted almost entirely by mail. For an endeavor involving millions of voters put together on the fly, the results have been mostly positive and voters engaged. In my hometown of Paterson the state Attorney General has uncovered evidence of fraud attempts in a municipal election that I don't dismiss, but it is my firm belief that this is an isolated incident and is not reflective of the safety or reliability of mail-in voting. So there are obviously kinks to be fixed, especially if we are forced to do all-mail voting in November. The same applies for the other 49 states facing similar decisions. This is why Trump's attacks on the United States Postal Service are so dangerous. Trump has made a poisonous target of voting by mail, claiming repeatedly (without evidence) that it is ripe for ballot fraud. Worse yet, while the U.S. Postal Service has worked bravely during the pandemic, Trump has rejected any support for the public service even as managers say without help the postal service may shutter in September. Trump is even openly sabotaging the postal service, forcing out career leaders from its leadership and installing political hacks. In an incredible scandal just revealed, Trump's handpicked new postal service head is ordering employees to deliberately delay deliveries. The electoral implications for the destruction of the postal service are momentous. If it is forced to curtail its service, our ability to hold a national election could be obliterated. If there is a silver lining to this crisis, the solutions to protect voting are straightforward and Congress has acted on them. First, in May, the House passed a $25 billion lifeline to keep the post office alive (as well as $3 billion to states to strengthen mail voting infrastructure). The New Jersey delegation has been especially engaged in working with the postal service. In June, I led a call between our membership and postal officials to make sure the agency has the tools it needs to conduct expanded vote-by-mail in New Jersey. Similarly, in February the House overwhelmingly passed legislation to free the postal service from the prefunding of employee health care plans that has financially savaged the post office. Second, we have focused on saving the Voting Rights Act. Now 235 days ago, the House passed H.R. 4 to restore the Voting Rights Act and to undo the court's decision in Shelby County. Back in 2006, the Voting Rights Act was renewed by massive margins. Its passage this year with virtually no Republican support speaks to the GOP's tragic growing hostility to democracy. Nonetheless, our reauthorization of the legislation is one of the most important actions Congress has taken this session. These bills would go a long way to protecting our elections and your right to vote. Trump and Mitch McConnell are blocking all of them. While I am not fully optimistic that we can clear these measures in this current Congress, we won't stop pushing until all of them become law. In New Jersey, county clerks and Boards of Election must have mail ballots printed and ready and begin finetuning their capability to count expeditiously on Election Day. And the state must undertake a massive promotion effort to build public awareness of vote-by-mail. We need an early start now. But even if Trump is defeated in November and replaced in January, he has exposed the tenuous weakness of our pillar institutions. If Americans lose faith in the legitimacy and fairness of our elections, democracy itself will be unsustainable. Protecting democracy must be one of our absolute top priorities in 2021. We could enact no better monument to John Lewis's life than that.
Tue 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT
1 College Blvd, Paterson, NJ 07505-1102, United States
Tue 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT
Passaic County Community College Paterson, NJ
Fri EDT