Former Member, Agriculture Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Former Member, Communications and Technology Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Former Ranking Minority Member, Elections Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Former Member, Agriculture Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Former Member, Communications and Technology Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Former Ranking Minority Member, Elections Committee, Michigan State House of Representatives
Reason for Seeking Public Office:
I am running for Congress for the same reason I ran for City Council, for Mayor, and for State Representative: Because I believe in serving my neighbors and giving a voice to the people in my community. I believe people in my district want a representative who will work for a better Michigan: one who prioritizes education, local businesses, working families, and protecting our treasured natural resources.
I know the people of the 7th Congressional District believe in a uniquely Michigan version of the American Dream. A dream of vibrant communities, world-class public schools, and Michigan businesses offering great jobs to Michigan talent, based in a state with unique beauty and natural resources. People in our community believe in the power of a uniquely American promise--equality of opportunity--and recognize that, even today, this promise remains unfulfilled for far too many in Michigan.
These are not Democratic or Republican values. These are our values. They are the bedrock of Michigan's once and future prosperity. And just as these values deserved a champion in Lansing, they deserve a champion in Washington.
I am running because there is work to be done. For the families that have seen their Michigan dream torn down, let's rebuild it. For the families that have built their own Michigan dream with hard work and determination, let's help them protect it. I'm excited to take that message to every voter in this district, and to ask them for their support as we work to take Michigan values to Washington and rebuild the Michigan dream.
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- No
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position
By Jonathan Oosting The attacks are flying fast and furious in Michigan's 7th Congressional district, where Republican U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg and Democratic challenger Gretchen Driskell are exchanging blows over trustworthiness, trade deals and more. It is one of two congressional races in Michigan being aggressively targeted by national Democrats in an uphill bid to regain control of the Republican-led U.S. House. The race has quickly turned negative despite the relatively pleasant demeanors of Driskell, a state legislator and former mayor of Saline, and Walberg, a pastor from the small town of Tipton. Driskell has run more television ads than any candidate in the state, labeling Walberg "trade deal Tim" for votes supporting U.S. agreements with Colombia, South Korea, Panama and Peru. She argues the pacts have cost jobs in a district with strong manufacturing and agricultural bases. Walberg did vote for the deals but contends Driskell is distorting his record in light of the national debate over the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-county trade deal that is not yet ratified. He voted to give President Barack Obama fast-track authority to negotiate TPP but opposes the final product and argues it should be renegotiated.Play Video Congressman Tim Walberg makes re-election pitch for his seat in Michigan's 7th Congressional district. "She's attacking me for being a free and fair trader -- that I've never hidden," Walberg told The Detroit News at his Jackson campaign office. "We have a global economy. I think she would understand that, and if we don't compete in the global marketplace, we lose." In a response ad, Walberg noted that Driskell called herself a real estate "broker" online and in 2010 committee testimony even though she is a real estate agent without the training required for a state broker's license. The commercial suggested she "lies about herself." "Gretchen seems to have trouble -- just like Ms. Clinton -- with telling the truth," said Walberg, linking the Democrat to her party's presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton. Driskell, who has held a Michigan real estate salesperson license since 2003, argues the terms "broker" and "agent" are often used interchangeably in the commercial real estate world, a characterization confirmed by the chief executive of the Michigan Commercial Board of Realtors. She said she has never represented herself as a managing or associate broker. "It's a national standard, and I think this is just a diversion on really not wanting to talk about the facts of how Mr. Walberg has voted on things," Driskell told The News at a campaign field office in Dexter. Driskell said she supports exporting products but not jobs. "Let's figure out a way to get to that point, and that'll probably be a lot of the work I do in Congress," she said. Through Sept. 19, Driskell had spent an estimated $586,000 on television ads, according to a Michigan Campaign Finance Network analysis of Kantar Media tracking data. Walberg had spent roughly $158,000. "This race could get even more pricey in the next few weeks if outside groups start spending," said Craig Mauger, executive director of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network. "This could easily be the most expensive race this cycle in Michigan and one of the more expensive nationally in recent cycles." The Trump factor The 7th District race "leans Republican," according to the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. Libertarian Ken Proctor of Charlotte is also on the ballot. "Democrats were really feeling hopeful this summer because a lot of Republicans and independent women were pretty repulsed by (Republican presidential candidate) Donald Trump," said Susan Demas, owner of Inside Michigan Politics newsletter. "They saw an opening in the 7th, but with Trump's numbers improving, it's going to make Driskell's climb a lot harder." Driskell has proven to be a capable fundraiser and been active in knocking on doors, Demas said, but Walberg is good on the stump and is often underestimated. "Not only is he a good campaigner, he's not afraid to get dirty," she said. "He's a minister, but he's been a politician for decades, and he knows what he's doing." Walberg has a history of narrow finishes in the district, but boundaries were redrawn ahead of the 2012 election. The move benefited the Republican incumbent, who won by more than 10 percentage points each of the last two cycles. Walberg was elected to the U.S. House in 2006 after defeating U.S. Rep. Joe Schwarz in the Republican primary, but he lost to Democrat Mark Schauer by less than two points in 2008. Two years later, Walberg beat Schauer in a rematch by less than five points and has held the seat since. The district now includes Branch, Eaton, Hillsdale, Jackson, Lenawee and Monroe counties along with a portion of Washtenaw County. President Barack Obama barely won the district in 2008 and narrowly lost the district in 2012. "We often joked that we don't understand how these people can live together in the same communities, because they're often kind of extreme in the primary and then moderate in the generals," said John Truscott, a GOP consultant who worked on Schwarz campaigns. "I think it's competitive, but I also think it's probably one of the districts where a Trump turnout can probably help Walberg." Driskell said some voters who support her have told her they also support Trump, citing conversations she's had while knocking on doors. "The issue for a lot of people in the district is the economy and jobs, and feeling there's a positive future for them and their families," she said. "Trump speaks to some of those issues, and I feel like Hillary speaks to a lot more, with policy behind her and experience." Walberg acknowledged that Trump has "been challenged with speaking all too blatantly" but has made clear he is supporting the Republican nominee. Democratic and Republican presidential candidates in recent years have sometimes said things with which he disagrees, Walberg said, "but we don't deal with 100 percent or nothing." Moderates and extremes Both candidates are touting their bipartisan credentials while attempting to paint each other as extremists. Walberg is running a new ad calling Driskell a "typical liberal politician." His campaign claims she is an ineffective legislator because she has not sponsored a single bill that has become law in the Republican-led state Legislature. Driskell, who boasts endorsements from one-time moderate Republicans such as Schwarz and former Gov. William Milliken, said the Legislature is "very partisan right now," making it difficult for a Democrat to pass bills. The former mayor noted she has introduced bipartisan legislation and worked with local communities on issues she thinks are ripe for cooperation at the state level, including broadband and last-mile internet access. "At the end of the day, I do have a track record of doing work in the district, where it counts the most," Driskell said, adding that she "will just keep plugging away" at finding the tools and resources to address issues. It's Walberg who is out of touch, she said. "When people go to D.C., they tend to become very partisan, and I think Mr. Walberg has a track record of that," she said. "I think people are really looking for somebody like me who actually has a background of working across the aisle." Walberg, an avowed critic of the Obama administration who has repeatedly voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act, has also worked on bipartisan bills that have become law this session. He introduced legislation with Rep. Brenda Lawrence, D-Southfield, requiring federal agencies to identify and close expired grant accounts with zero balances. The dynamics of the district mean that "I have to be reasonable" to win over moderate voters, Walberg said. "I don't think my record has changed or my approach has changed, so I would expect that they would be there again, if they look at that record and don't just listen to rhetoric."
By Don Reid Democratic congressional candidate Gretchen Driskell and several of her young campaign staff spent time last Wednesday knocking on doors in Branch County asking for votes in her campaign against incumbent Seventh District Congressman Tim Walberg. Driskell currently represents the 57th District in the Michigan House, and after four years, has turned her attention to Congress. Prior to that, she was the first woman elected as mayor of Saline and served a record seven terms in that capacity. The independent election service Ballotpedia rates the Walberg/Driskell race as the only contested congressional race in Michigan this year. Speaking at the local Democratic Carl Levin Dinner last week, Driskell said she comes from a military family "where public service is a core value." Admitting that she has been frustrated in Lansing, she urged, "We all need to work together to make a stronger community, to look out for each other, especially the most vulnerable." Planks of her campaign call for support of a balanced budget with good infrastructure and accountability "against what we are calling these special interest groups that are changing the focus of government away from people." Driskell pointed to television ads she is running in the Detroit area, which covers the main portion of the district. "A lot of people are not familiar with how Mr. Walberg has been voting -- not in the interest of those in Michigan," she said. Driskell said Walberg had voted for "trade deals and taken money from companies who moved jobs overseas. "We want to export goods, but we don't want to export jobs," she said. The candidate said Walberg claims "he is about protecting Social Security and Medicare, but he has also talked about privatizing Social Security. He has voted for vouchers for Medicare and talked about privatizing it that would raise costs." "Walberg has a history of saying one thing and doing another," Driskell added. "That is why we are asking people to look at his record." When asked if the Clinton ticket would help her campaign, Driskell responded, "We are running our own campaign." Driskell pointed out that she started 18 months ago, long before the party had selected Clinton. "We do support her," she added. The candidate also said, "We have cross over vote." Driskell noted both she and Trump are talking about some of the same issues. The district "is filled with smaller communities, which used to have manufacturing that has left. We want to bring back manufacturing to Michigan." Driskell beat a Republican incumbent for the state House in 2012, then came back to win by 54 percent in 2014. Driskell would have to turn the district around. In the 2012 election, Republican Tim Walberg, the incumbent, polled 53.3 percent or 169,668 votes to beat Democrat Kurt R. Haskell, who received 43 percent or 136,849 votes. In the 2014 election with no national ballot, Tim Walberg received 119,564 votes, again 53.5 percent. Democratic challenger Pam Byrnes had 41.2 percent or 92,083 votes. From 2003 to 2013, the Seventh Congressional District consisted of all of Branch, Eaton, Hillsdale, Jackson and Lenawee counties. It had included most of Calhoun and a large portion of western and northern Washtenaw counties, as well. The district shifted east in the 2012 redistricting, and now includes the western suburbs of Ann Arbor and Monroe County, taking out Democratic voting portions of Calhoun County.