Elise Stefanik
RRunning, 2024 New York U.S. House District 21, General Election
Won the General, 2022 New York U.S. House District 21
New York U.S. House, District 21 (2014 - Present)
To be claimed
Former Member, Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Education and the Workforce Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, National Security Agency (NSA) and Cybersecurity Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Human Services, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats & Capabilities, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Military Personnel, United States House of Representatives`
Former Member, Subcommittee on Readiness, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Workforce Protections Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Education and the Workforce Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, National Security Agency (NSA) and Cybersecurity Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Military Personnel, United States House of Representatives`
Former Member, Workforce Protections Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Member, Armed Services Committee
Member, Education & Labor Committee
Member, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information Systems
Member, Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Investment
Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces
Member, Subcommittee on Workforce Protections
— Awards:
Priority Issues:
-Creating jobs and economic opportunities for small businesses to grow in Upstate New York.
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- No
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- No
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Yes
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Yes
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- No
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- No
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- No
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Yes
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Yes
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Yes
Latest Action: House - 06/21/2019 Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Tracker:By Rep. Elise Stefanik The COVID-19 pandemic has affected seemingly every aspect of our way of life. It has taken our loved ones, devastated our economy, rocked our healthcare system, and shuttered our schools. But perhaps, most tragically of all, it has had devastating effects on our children. Experts believe that the rise in job loss and economic instability, coupled with measures including lockdowns and school closures, has caused a drastic, hidden surge in child abuse and neglect. The full impact of this crisis remains unknown, as children are spending less time with teachers, caretakers, coaches, and other adults who most often report mistreatment. Child protective services agencies and community-based organizations continue to work on the front line of this crisis, but Congress must do its part to address this tragic reality. Fortunately, there is an opportunity to do so in the coming week -- by voting for the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. I'm co-leading this legislation with a bipartisan group of my colleagues on the House Education and Labor Committee to help states improve the effectiveness of child protective services, strengthen networks of prevention services to support families, improve coordination and data-sharing between states, provide states resources to develop statewide networks of family services, and increase collaboration with parents and other members of the community in planning and implementing supportive services. I co-authored a critical provision in the bill that will establish a national child abuse hotline. The hotline would serve as a life-saving resource for abused children and as a tool for adults seeking advice upon witnessing signs of neglect among children in their neighborhoods, apartment buildings, and communities. The Stronger CAPTA Act, and particularly this bipartisan provision to establish a national child abuse hotline, comes to the House floor at a critical time in which we can make urgently needed improvements to measures that will prevent child abuse in the months and years ahead. The Stronger CAPTA Act will fund research on child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment strategies, improve technical assistance networks to help local providers put these strategies into practice, and enhance professional development opportunities for child welfare staff. Every member of Congress has a solemn responsibility to help America's children during the crisis we face and to provide them with a safer, better future. This week, we have an opportunity to do just that. We must come together to pass the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Millions of children in America depend on it.
By Elise Stefanik As countries across the globe struggle to cope with the human and economic costs of COVID-19, it is of grave concern that some in the United States have advocated for cuts to defense spending in order to focus on the response to the virus. This is a false choice. COVID-19 is not the first or only global crisis that the United States has had to confront, and history demonstrates that America is able to respond simultaneously to crises without jeopardizing our national defense. The United States has already responded with the largest economic rescue plan for individuals, families, and businesses in our nation's history. While we are 30 years removed from the Cold War, or 75 years from the last world war, the global landscape is more complex and increasingly dangerous. The war in Syria--or a virus in Wuhan--show that seemingly isolated crises have significant global consequences. Similarly, state actors are no longer the sole threat to our security, as transnational crime, Islamic terrorist groups, and cyber criminals continue to threaten our national security interests. There is broad agreement that we currently face a renewed era of "great power competition," in which the United States' superpower status is challenged by rising powers. In the last few years, China has expanded its reach to the Arctic, and has built and militarized artificial islands in critical maritime shipping lanes. An emboldened Russia annexed the territory of a sovereign state. And the fanatical regime in Iran has at times controlled four separate Arab capitals and inflamed regional conflicts in their effort to attain regional hegemony. All of these actions are a direct threat to the interests of the United States and our allies, and erode global norms upheld by the United States and other like-minded states. Cuts to our defense spending at this time would signal to our allies, and our adversaries, that the United States in unprepared to face the increasing complexities and dangers around the world. Such a pullback would embolden our adversaries and further encourage destabilizing actions by bad actors like China, Russia, and Iran. If our desire is to see freedom, democracy, and open economies flourish in the 21st century, we must not jeopardize our military readiness and diminish capabilities critical to protect our interests. Recognizing this evolving global landscape, our adversaries are not pulling back and are taking steps to invest in their military capabilities. Global defense spending is on the rise, reaching a record $1.917 trillion in 2019. Our adversaries are adding significantly to these yearly increases. For example, China recently announced a 6.6% increase in defense spending, despite significant drops in gross domestic product due to COVID-19. Not only are various adversaries increasing their defense spending, but they are spending that money on military capabilities that directly threaten our deployed troops and allies abroad, as well as the United States homeland. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps recently launched a satellite with a solid fuel rocket that significantly boosts its military rocket and missile capabilities. Russia and China are both developing hypersonic missile capabilities that present significant challenges for our missile defenses. Meanwhile, North Korea continues to conduct advanced missile tests. This is why I continue to advocate for increased investment on U.S. missile defenses and an East Coast missile defense site at Fort Drum in my district in upstate New York. In addition, these adversaries are turning to cyber operations and propaganda to harm U.S. interests at home and abroad. We must maintain adequate funding to challenge the asymmetric, or "gray zone," capabilities as well. Defense spending is not just for the purchasing of standard defense equipment like tanks and bombs. Our annual defense budget authorizes billions of dollars a year for critical research and development efforts that are critical to protect global health. For example, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, and other defense agencies and laboratories, are at the leading edge of vaccine research and development for viruses like COVID-19, as they were for Ebola treatments in the past. Similarly, many ubiquitous everyday items and services have come from the military's research, such as the internet and GPS. In short, many of the things we use today are direct results of defense research, development, and innovation. When we consider our defense budgets, we must recognize how critical this investment is not just to our military, but our overall society as well. The United States will continue to allocate resources for fighting COVID-19 in the months and years ahead, as we undoubtedly will when we confront global crises in the future. Therefore, we must spend our taxpayer dollars in a smarter, more efficient way, while addressing opportunities for savings. Thankfully, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper was doing this before we were confronted with COVID-19. In a four-month span in late 2019, the Department of Defense found more than $5 billion in savings among the department's 27 individual agencies, and the secretary has committed to continuing these efforts to maximize every dollar of funding across the department. I have the privilege of serving on both the House Armed Services Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in Congress, and I believe that the United States must continue to have the strongest national defense and military in the world. There is no other option. We must not take critical resources from our men and women in uniform and those serving to strengthen our national defense to keep Americans safe. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us that our adversaries--like China--are simply not up to the job of being a world leader. We cannot allow them to become one.
By Elise Stefanik Only available in PDF format; please see source to view document.